From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Saints Constantine and Helen Greek Orthodox Church, Inc. v. City of New Berlin
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
396 F.3d 895 (2005)
A Greek Orthodox church (plaintiff) purchased 40 acres of land in the City of New Berlin (city) (defendant), for the purpose of building a church. The land was zoned for residential use. The church applied to the city to rezone a portion of the land for institutional use. The city was concerned that a nonreligious facility might be built on the land if the church was unable to raise the funds required for construction. The church proposed that the city issue an ordinance limiting the land to church-related uses. The city voted against the proposal due to the inaccurate belief that an entity that purchased land from the church would not be bound by the ordinance. The city supported two alternative options. The first was a conditional-use permit, which did not require a zoning change but lapsed within a year. The second was an ordinance that would overlie residential zoning, so that the property would revert to residential use if sold by the church. The first option was undesirable to the church due to the time limit. The church also declined to resume the application process under the second option, because the option had the same effect as the church’s proposal. The church concluded that its options were to either sell the land or face an unreasonable delay by restarting the application process to satisfy a concern that the church had already addressed. The church sued the city, claiming that denial of the rezoning application violated subsection (a)(1) of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA). The RLUIPA prevented a government agency from imposing or implementing a land-use regulation in a manner that imposed a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. The city claimed that it had treated the church equally to other zoning-variance applicants. The district court granted summary judgment for the city.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.