Salerno v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs

429 F.2d 1003 (1970)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Salerno v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
429 F.2d 1003 (1970)

Facts

Alexander Salerno and other umpires (plaintiffs) formerly employed by the American League of Professional Baseball Clubs (league) (defendant) sued the league, Bowie Kuhn (the commissioner of Major League Baseball (MLB)), and others (defendants), alleging that they were fired for attempting to unionize the league’s umpires. Per the umpires, the league’s actions violated the federal Sherman Antitrust Act. Kuhn (the only defendant who was served with process) moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction due to MLB’s immunity from federal antitrust liability pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Club and Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. The district court granted Kuhn’s motion. The umpires appealed, arguing that the Supreme Court likely would overrule Federal Baseball and Toolson based on new developments, particularly MLB’s increased revenue from interstate commerce.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Friendly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership