Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Salinas v. Texas

133 S. Ct. 2174 (2013)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Salinas v. Texas

United States Supreme Court

133 S. Ct. 2174 (2013)

Play video

Facts

Salinas (defendant) agreed to go to the police station to answer questions about a murder. Salinas was not in custody and thus was not given Miranda warnings. Salinas answered a number of questions, but was then asked if his shotgun would match the shells at the scene of the murder. Salinas did not answer, but rather “looked down at the floor, shuffled his feet, bit his bottom lip, and clenched his hands in his lap.” Salinas was charged with the murder, and at trial the prosecution used Salinas’s reaction to the question as evidence that he was guilty. Salinas objected to the prosecutor’s use of his silence, arguing that it violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. [After Salinas was convicted and unable to obtain relief at state level], the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)

Concurrence (Thomas, J.)

Dissent (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership