Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Salinger v. Colting

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
607 F.3d 68 (2010)


Facts

In 1953, J.D. Salinger (plaintiff) published The Catcher in the Rye. The Catcher in the Rye was a coming-of-age story about a sixteen-year-old boy named Holden Caulfield. The book became famous, selling millions of copies and receiving critical acclaim. Salinger holds a copyright for the book and for the book’s main character. In 2009, Fredrik Colting (defendant) published 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye (60 Years Later) in England. The book depicts a 90-year-old author who is haunted by the teenager character that he invented, Mr. C, who is now 76-years old. Mr. C shares may of Holden Caulfield’s quirks, and the novel has scenes set in identical places to key scenes in The Catcher in the Rye. 60 Years Later was described by some reviewers as a sequel to The Catcher in the Rye. Salinger sued Colting for copyright infringement and asked for a preliminary injunction. The district court: (1) found that Salinger had shown he was likely to succeed on the merits of his claim for copyright infringement, and (2) relied on that finding to presume Salinger would suffer irreparable harm without a preliminary injunction. The district court then issued a preliminary injunction against Colting. Colting appealed, arguing that under eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006), the district court could not presume irreparable harm. Colting claimed that Salinger had to actually demonstrate that Salinger was likely to suffer irreparable injury without an injunction before the court could issue a preliminary injunction.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.