Sally Beauty Co. v. Nexxus Products Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
801 F.2d 1001 (1986)


Facts

In 1979, Best Barber Beauty & Supply Company (Best) entered into a contract with Nexxus Products Co. (Nexxus) (defendant), a California producer of hair care products. The contract provided that Best would promote and be the exclusive distributor of Nexxus products in Texas. The letter agreement between Best and Nexxus was executed following several days of meetings between Nexxus’ vice president and Best’s president. In 1981, Sally Beauty Company (Sally) (plaintiff) purchased Best and merged the businesses. As a result of the merger, Sally received assignment, as successor in interest, of all of Best’s contracts, including the contract with Nexxus. Following the acquisition and merger, Nexxus renounced its agreement with Best, because Sally, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Alberto-Culver which also produced hair care products, was under the control of a direct competitor of Nexxus. Sally sued Nexxus alleging, inter alia, breach of contract. The district court granted Nexxus’ motion for summary judgment finding that the parties based their agreement on “a relationship of personal trust and confidence,” and therefore Best’s performance could not be delegated. Sally appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is for members only. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Issue

The issue section is for members only and includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section is for members only and includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Dissent (Posner, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Here's why 10,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 7,515 briefs - keyed to 85 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now