Salvatore v. Commissioner

T.C. Memo 1970-30 (1970)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Salvatore v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1970-30 (1970)

SR
Play video

Facts

In 1948, Susie Salvatore (plaintiff) inherited her husband’s gas-station business. Salvatore’s children operated the gas station and kept most of the proceeds, but Salvatore received enough of the proceeds to cover her living expenses. By 1963, only one of the children, Amedeo, still worked at the gas station. Amedeo opened negotiations to sell the gas-station property (property) to Texaco, Inc. (Texaco). In July 1963, Texaco offered Amedeo $295,000 to buy the property. Later that month, Salvatore accepted Texaco’s offer. The family agreed that Salvatore and her children would divide the sale proceeds, with Salvatore’s share based on the family’s estimate that Salvatore needed $100,000 to support her for the rest of her life. The family also agreed that Salvatore, without consideration, would transfer one-half of her interest in the property to her children. Salvatore made this half-interest transfer in August 1963. The sale was completed in September 1963, when Salvatore and her children each transferred their interests in the property to Texaco. Salvatore received one-half of the net sale proceeds, and the children divided the other half. On her 1963 federal income-tax return, Salvatore reported her half of the sale proceeds as a capital gain. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that all of the sale proceeds were taxable as Salvatore’s capital gain. Salvatore petitioned the tax court for a redetermination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Featherston, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership