Samaniego v. Empire Today, LLC
California Court of Appeal
140 Cal. Rptr. 3d 492 (2012)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Salome Samaniego (plaintiff) was hired as a carpet installer for Empire Today, LLC (defendant). Empire presented Samaniego with a form contract, or contract of adhesion, which Samaniego was required to sign if he wished to begin work for Empire. The contract was 11 pages, single-spaced, in small font. English was not Samaniego’s first language, and Empire refused to provide a copy of the contract in Spanish. Samaniego signed the contract. The contract contained an arbitration clause, but Empire did not provide Samaniego with a copy of the arbitration rules to which he was agreeing. The contract shortened the statute of limitations for bringing a claim against Empire. The contract also required Samaniego to pay Empire’s attorney’s fees, but with no reciprocal requirement on Empire. Finally, the contract exempted from the arbitration clause a number of claims typically brought by employers, while adding no such exemption for claims typically brought by employees. Samaniego filed a putative class action against Empire, alleging violations of labor laws. Empire filed a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the contract. The trial court denied Empire’s motion, finding that the contract was unconscionable. Empire appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Siggins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.