Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

Sampson v. Murray

United States Supreme Court
415 U.S. 61 (1974)


The plaintiff, a probationary employee of the federal government, was discharged. A personnel officer suggested that the basis for the discharge may have included reports about her previous employment with another agency. If this were true, then the plaintiff would have been entitled to procedural protections that were not provided. The plaintiff sued the federal government (defendant), seeking an injunction preventing her discharge until completion of an administrative appeal to the Civil Service Commission. The trial court entered a temporary restraining order and held a hearing on the issues. The trial court determined that W.H. Sanders, the official who fired the plaintiff, should testify. The federal government refused to produce Sanders because it denied that the trial court had jurisdiction to inquire into the facts. The trial court extended the temporary restraining order until Sanders was produced. The government appealed the order to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which affirmed the order. The government petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

Dissent (Marshall, J.)

Dissent (Douglas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 507,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 507,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial