Samuel Rappaport Family Partnership v. Meridian Bank

657 A.2d 17 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Samuel Rappaport Family Partnership v. Meridian Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
657 A.2d 17 (1995)

Facts

In May 1985, McKlan, Inc. (McKlan) entered into a lease for property that required McKlan to sign a $100,000 letter of credit. Three months later, Marvin Orleans purchased the property and was assigned the former landlords’ interest in the lease. Meridian Bank (Meridian) (defendant) issued the required letter of credit upon McKlan’s instruction. The letter of credit conditioned payment upon Meridian’s receipt of (1) a draft from escrow agent David Pincus, (2) certification that McKlan had received notice of the draft presentment, and (3) a certificate signed by Orleans. Shortly thereafter, Orleans died. Pincus subsequently presented a draft to Meridian, including the required documents. However, because Orleans had died, the required certificate was instead signed by Samuel Rappaport (plaintiff), who had bought the property from Orleans’s estate. Meridian refused to issue payment on the letter of credit, because the draft was not presented with a certificate signed by Orleans as required. Rappaport brought suit against Meridian, arguing that Orleans’s death called into question the continued validity of the letter-of-credit provision requiring a certificate bearing Orleans’s signature. The trial court found in Meridian’s favor, concluding that dishonor of the draft was proper based on insufficient compliance with the conditions for the letter of credit. Rappaport appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hester, J.)

Concurrence (Olszewski, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership