San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States

272 F. Supp. 2d 860 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States

United States District Court for the District of Arizona
272 F. Supp. 2d 860 (2003)

Facts

In the 1920s the United States (defendant) built a dam pursuant to federal legislation to provide irrigation for an Indian reservation and for private non-Indian land. The level of the reservoir fluctuated greatly depending on precipitation and irrigation needs. The San Carlos Apache Tribe (the tribe) (plaintiff) ran fishing and camping operations on the reservoir. In 1999 the tribe brought a lawsuit for common-law nuisance in federal district court against the federal government and various federal agencies to enjoin the release of water, seeking to maintain a specific minimum volume of water in the reservoir. The tribe claimed that the draining of the reservoir below this minimum level threatened injury and health risks to the public and to tribe members. The federal government moved to dismiss the suit on the ground that the tribe had failed to provide the requisite notice under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bury, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership