San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
272 F. Supp. 2d 860 (2003)
- Written by Abby Keenan, JD
Facts
In the 1920s the United States (defendant) built a dam pursuant to federal legislation to provide irrigation for an Indian reservation and for private non-Indian land. The level of the reservoir fluctuated greatly depending on precipitation and irrigation needs. The San Carlos Apache Tribe (the tribe) (plaintiff) ran fishing and camping operations on the reservoir. In 1999 the tribe brought a lawsuit for common-law nuisance in federal district court against the federal government and various federal agencies to enjoin the release of water, seeking to maintain a specific minimum volume of water in the reservoir. The tribe claimed that the draining of the reservoir below this minimum level threatened injury and health risks to the public and to tribe members. The federal government moved to dismiss the suit on the ground that the tribe had failed to provide the requisite notice under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bury, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.