Sanchez v. Town of Beaufort
North Carolina Court of Appeals
710 S.E.2d 350 (2011)

- Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD
Facts
Gerharda Sanchez (plaintiff) filed suit to appeal an order of the Town of Beaufort (Town) (defendant) Board of Adjustment (BOA) ordering the Beaufort Historic Preservation Commission (BHPC) to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to Sanchez’s across-the-street neighbor, Douglas Smith, that would allow Smith to replace a 16-foot structure on his property with a 27-foot structure. Sanchez’s and Smith’s properties were located in a historic district of Beaufort, and Smith had already engaged in numerous attempts at obtaining a COA to demolish and rebuild on his property. The existing structure on Smith’s property was deemed beyond repair and approved for demolition, but the BHPC determined that a COA would only be issued for Smith’s new build if the structure could be reduced to a maximum height of 24 feet. The 24-foot maximum was based largely off the personal preferences and opinions of individual BHPC board members, despite evidence presented that the historic district included structures ranging from 20 to 35 feet. It was also noted on the record that any building over 16 feet would block views from the street. Smith appealed to the BOA, who concluded that the BHPC’s height requirement was arbitrary and capricious and remanded the matter back to the BHPC to issue the COA to Smith. Sanchez appealed to the superior court, arguing that Smith’s planned structure did not conform with BHPC guidelines, would block the view from her home, and would devalue her property by over $100,000. The superior court affirmed the BOA’s decision, and Sanchez appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Calabria, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.