From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Sanders v. Daniel International Corporation
Missouri Supreme Court
682 S.W.2d 803 (1984)
Robert A. Sanders (plaintiff) and six coworkers at the Daniel International Corporation (Daniel) (defendant) were arrested and charged with theft from their workplace. The charges were dropped after the prosecutor determined there was insufficient evidence to proceed with a criminal trial. Thereafter, Sanders sued Daniel for malicious prosecution. The jury returned a verdict for Sanders and awarded him $100,000 in actual damages and $250,000 in punitive damages. Daniel appealed and argued that the applied law improperly defined the malice necessary for a malicious-prosecution claim because it used the malice-in-law definition, which only required a finding that Daniel committed a wrongful act intentionally without just cause or excuse.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Welliver, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.