Sanders v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
303 S.E.2d 13 (1983)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Lillian Sanders (defendant) was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of her infant daughter, Cassandra. At trial, the evidence showed that Cassandra had been born premature by 12 weeks and had significant health issues. On the night of Cassandra’s death, Sanders went to a neighbor’s house to call for an ambulance and indicated that Cassandra was ill. Emergency personnel arrived to find multiple bruises on Cassandra’s neck, face, chest, and abdomen, as well as blood on Cassandra’s head. Cassandra died shortly thereafter. At the hospital, the police and a worker from child-protective services questioned Sanders, who initially indicated that she did not know what happened to Cassandra. However, Sanders later admitted that she might have dropped Cassandra on the ground and then struck Cassandra to make her stop crying. Medical evidence revealed that the primary cause of Cassandra’s death was a severe head injury. Additionally, Cassandra had multiple contusions all over her body, indicating an ongoing series of blows. At trial, a clinical psychologist for the prosecution testified that Sanders exhibited several characteristics of a battering parent and concluded that Sanders met the criteria for battering-parent syndrome, because she carried forward to her own children a pattern of violent and abusive conduct that she had experienced when she was young. Further, the psychologist stated that Sanders was under ongoing stress caused by money and housing and had a history of using poor social judgment. Sanders was convicted and subsequently appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
