Sanders v. State

63 So. 3d 497 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sanders v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court
63 So. 3d 497 (2011)

Play video

Facts

On December 29, 1985, Keir Sanders (defendant) shot and killed his grandfather, W.D. Crawford, and then shot his grandmother, Elma. Officers arrived to discover Elma wounded but still alive. Elma told officers that Sanders had shot her and W.D. and pulled the phone from the wall before escaping in W.D.’s car. Elma died several months later. Officers located W.D.’s car, but Sanders evaded capture until 2005, using at least six different aliases. The State of Mississippi (plaintiff) charged Sanders with the murders. At trial, Dr. John McCoy testified that Sanders had been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder years before the incident. Dr. McCoy further testified that at the time of the killings, Sanders was laboring under a defect of reason caused by a disease of the mind that prevented him from understanding that his conduct was wrong. Dr. Mark Webb agreed with Dr. McCoy that while Sanders understood the nature and quality of his actions, he did not know that what he did was wrong. Dr. William Lott, however, disagreed, concluding that Sanders did know that his conduct was wrong. Dr. Lott based his opinion on Sanders’s seemingly well-reasoned and -planned conduct on the day of the killings and in the following years. Specifically, Dr. Lott highlighted that Sanders purposely unplugged the phone and fled the scene, evading capture for many years. The jury found Sanders not guilty by reason of insanity for W.D.’s murder but concluded that Sanders was guilty of Elma’s murder. Sanders appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pierce, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership