From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Sanders v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
154 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 1998)
Sanders (plaintiff) sued his employer Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) (defendant) for an injury he sustained at work under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act. The trial judge issued an order laying out the schedule for filing of motions and other pretrial documents and threatened sanctions for failure to comply, which included dismissal of the case. Sanders’s attorney failed to comply with most of these requirements because he had been too busy with another case and was not receiving cooperation from Union Pacific attorneys. He did not file for a continuance. The court dismissed Sanders’s action with prejudice. Sanders appeals the district court’s dismissal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
Dissent (Canby, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.