This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

64 F.3d 1026 (1995)

Facts

Ronald Sandison and Craig Stanley (plaintiffs) suffered from learning disabilities that delayed their progress in school and placed them two grade levels behind most other students their age. Sandison and Stanley participated in interscholastic cross-country and track teams during their first three years at Michigan public high schools (defendants), but the students turned 19 years old before the start of their senior year and were then found ineligible for continued participation. The schools belonged to the Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc. (MHSAA) (defendant), which had adopted regulations that prohibited students over 19 years old from playing interscholastic sports. The age-ceiling eligibility criterion could not be waived. Sandison and Stanley sued MHSAA and their high schools alleging unlawful disability discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act. The district court issued a preliminary injunction allowing the students to participate. The court found that cross-country and track were noncontact sports and Sandison and Stanley were not “star” athletes. MHSAA appealed, conceding that the students were disabled within the meaning of the act but disputing any discrimination based on disability.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support