Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Sandler v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
644 N.E.2d 641 (1995)


Facts

Sandler (plaintiff) sustained injuries from a fall off of his bicycle, as he rode along a bikeway one evening and was attempting to pass through a tunnel under a bridge. The bikeway was controlled by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (defendant) through the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). Sandler’s fall was caused by an uncovered drain in the tunnel. The drain was supposed to be covered and the tunnel well lit, but vandals had smashed out the tunnel’s lights and removed the drain’s cover. Consequently, Sandler could not see the defective drain. Sandler sued the Commonwealth. By statute, Sandler was not permitted to allege a claim of negligence against the MDC, but rather was required to prove recklessness in order to recover. At trial, one MDC employee testified that he could not recall the last time the tunnel lights had worked properly. The employee further testified that the drain covers were not routinely replaced. At the close of the evidence, the trial judge instructed the jury that the MDC could be found liable only if it acted willfully, wantonly, or recklessly. The jury held for Sandler. The Commonwealth filed motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial judge denied both motions. The Commonwealth appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkins, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.