Sandor v. Safe Horizon, Inc.

2011 WL 115295 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sandor v. Safe Horizon, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
2011 WL 115295 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Stephanie Sandor (plaintiff), a female, worked for Safe Horizon, Inc. (SH) (defendant) as a human-resources manager at a full-time salary of $47,578. SH was seeking a maternity-leave replacement for Abigail Saunders, the employee-relations manager for SH’s domestic-violence shelters. The job posting stated that SH was seeking someone with an undergraduate degree and at least three to five years of human-resources experience. The job entailed support for 700 employees. SH hired Richard Brown, a male, to temporarily replace Saunders. Brown was a high-school graduate, had completed certificate programs in not-for-profit management, and was unemployed when hired. Brown had worked as a hotel human-resources manager and assistant director, a hotel quality-assurance director, and the director of a human-resources department that was being developed. SH paid Brown an 80 percent full-time salary of $44,752, which was equivalent to a 100 percent full-time salary of $55,940 and meant Brown was working four days a week. Saunders had been earning $44,752 for 100 percent full-time work. Sandor resigned after SH declined to promote her to senior director and promoted Brown instead. Sandor sued SH for discriminating against her on the basis of her gender in violation of the Equal Pay Act (EPA). Sandor moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gold, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership