From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Santa Fe Pacific Gold Company v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
132 T.C. 240 (2009)
Santa Fe Pacific Gold Company (Santa Fe) (plaintiff) was a mining company. Newmont, one of the largest mining companies in the country, wanted to acquire Santa Fe because Santa Fe had a larger operation in Nevada than Newmont did. Santa Fe’s executives feared that Newmont wanted to take over Santa Fe’s business. To avoid a merger with Newmont, Santa Fe’s executives reached a deal with another small mining company, Homestake. Santa Fe’s executives believed that a merger with Homestake would be more beneficial to Santa Fe than a merger with Newmont because Santa Fe and Homestake would share management and board control, and more of Santa Fe’s employees would remain employed after the merger. Santa Fe and Homestake entered into a merger agreement. The agreement contained a termination-fee clause that required any party that breached the merger agreement because of a third-party offer to pay the remaining party a termination fee of $65 million. The fee was meant to protect the agreement between Santa Fe and Homestake. Newmont increased its offer to Santa Fe to merge the companies, and Homestake was unable to match the increase. Fiduciary-duty laws required Santa Fe’s board to accept the highest offer, so Santa Fe accepted Newmont’s offer to merge. As a result, Santa Fe paid the $65 million termination fee to Homestake. After the merger, Newmont closed all of Santa Fe’s offices and fired most of Santa Fe’s employees in a hostile takeover. Santa Fe deducted the termination fee it paid to Homestake from its taxes as a business expense. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) disallowed the deduction, arguing that the fee was a capital expenditure rather than a business expense. Santa Fe petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goeke, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.