Santelli v. Electro-Motive

136 F.Supp.2d 922 (2001)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Santelli v. Electro-Motive

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
136 F.Supp.2d 922 (2001)

RW

Facts

Mary Santelli (plaintiff) worked for Electro-Motive (defendant), a division of General Motors Corporation. Electro-Motive discharged Santelli after she complained that Electro-Motive sexually discriminated against her. Santelli sued Electro-Motive for sex discrimination and retaliatory discharge. The court granted Electro-Motive's motion for summary judgment in part, but also denied the motion in part. Electro-Motive filed a motion to reconsider the partial denial of summary judgment, on the grounds that the court: (1) cited controlling Seventh Circuit case law while ignoring contrary case law from other circuits, (2) applied the wrong legal standard to compare Electro-Motive's treatment of its male and female employees, (3) misapplied the elements required to prove that a defense is pretextual, (4) mistakenly found that a reasonable trier of fact could agree with Santelli that her removal from an assignment was discriminatory, and (5) incorrectly described an incident that Electro-Motive considered relevant to the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 780,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Key Terms

Related Videos