Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Santelli v. Electro-Motive

188 F.R.D. 306 (1999)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Santelli v. Electro-Motive

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
188 F.R.D. 306 (1999)

Facts

Mary Santelli (plaintiff) was an employee of Electro-Motive (defendant). Santelli filed a Title VII employment-discrimination claim against Electro-Motive, alleging that she was denied certain welding positions because of her sex. Santelli’s complaint included a request for damages for mental distress, and during her deposition she testified that she had seen a psychotherapist for treatment of emotional distress she suffered as a result of Electro-Motive’s discrimination. Electro-Motive moved to compel production of Santelli’s medical records, including psychotherapy, alcohol and drug treatment, and HIV testing. In a hearing before a magistrate judge on the motion, Santelli’s attorney stated that her claim for mental-distress damages would be limited to damages for humiliation and embarrassment and that she would not seek compensation for any medical care or psychotherapy. Accordingly, the magistrate denied Electro-Motive’s motion to compel. Electro-Motive objected to the magistrate’s order.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms