Santer v. Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District
New York Court of Appeals
990 N.Y.S.2d 442 (2014)

- Written by Emily Laird, JD
Facts
Teachers who were members of a teachers’ union (plaintiffs) engaged in weekly picketing outside a middle school for over two years regarding the failure of their union and the local school district (defendant) to reach a collective-bargaining agreement. For over two years, the district had never disciplined the teachers for engaging in picketing. One rainy day, the teachers decided to picket from their cars to avoid standing in the rain. To ensure greater visibility, the teachers parked in a location that blocked a busy drop-off zone. Traffic backed up, causing 16 nonpicketing teachers to be tardy. Parents also had to drop off children in the middle of the street, where the children had to weave between cars to reach the school. Citing student safety hazards that rainy day, the district commenced misconduct proceedings against the involved teachers. An arbitrator found the teachers guilty of misconduct. The teachers appealed the decision to the state courts, arguing their conduct was protected by the First Amendment. The lower court affirmed the arbitrator’s decision, but the appellate court reversed, finding the teachers should not have been disciplined for First Amendment-protected activity. The district appealed to the state’s highest court, arguing its interest in safeguarding students and maintaining the effective operation of schools outweighed the teachers’ interest in engaging in free speech.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.