From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Santosky v. Kramer
United States Supreme Court
455 U.S. 745 (1982)
In November 1973, based on evidence of neglect, Kramer, the Commissioner of the Ulster County Department of Social Services (Social Services) (plaintiff), removed Tina Santosky from the home of her parents, John Santosky II and Annie Santosky (defendants). Ten months later, the Santoskys’ son John was also removed from their home, again on the basis of neglect. The Santoskys’ third child, Jed, was removed from their home three days after his birth, on the ground of imminent danger to his health. Over the next several years, Social Services procured training for the Santosky parents, relating to child welfare, psychiatric health, and vocational issues. The couple’s participation was minimal, but they maintained some contact with their children. In October 1978, Social Services petitioned to terminate the Santoskys’ parental rights. Against the objection of the Santoskys, the court reviewed the evidence under the statutory standard of “fair preponderance of the evidence.” The trial court ultimately decided that the Santoskys’ parental rights should be permanently terminated. The couple appealed unsuccessfully. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.