Sarl Louis Feraud International v. Viewfinder, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
489 F.3d 474 (2007)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Sarl Louis Feraud International and SA Pierre Balmain (the designers) (plaintiffs) were French clothing designers. The designers initiated an action in France’s Tribunal de grande instance de Paris for unauthorized use of intellectual property against Viewfinder, Inc. (defendant), a New York company that posted photographs of fashion shows on its website. The designers alleged that Viewfinder displayed pictures of their fashion shows that revealed designs from the designers’ new fashion lines. After Viewfinder failed to respond, the French court entered a default judgment against Viewfinder, finding that the Viewfinder website contained pictures of the designers’ fashion designs without authorization, and awarded damages to the designers. The designers filed actions in United States court, seeking to enforce the judgment of the French court based on New York’s Uniform Foreign Money Judgment Recognition Act (NY Recognition Act). The court dismissed the action on grounds that enforcing the decision of the French court would violate Viewfinder’s First Amendment rights. The court assumed that Viewfinder, as a media organization, had absolute First Amendment protection against copyright claims. The court also did not engage in substantive fair-use analysis before concluding that Viewfinder’s reproduction of the designers’ fashion shows was permitted under the fair-use exception. The designers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pooler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.