Sarvis v. Vermont State Colleges

772 A.2d 494 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sarvis v. Vermont State Colleges

Vermont Supreme Court
772 A.2d 494 (2001)

JL

Facts

Robert Sarvis (plaintiff) was convicted of five counts of bank fraud and served over three years in prison. Sarvis applied to several positions with Vermont State Colleges (College) (defendant), including as a professor to teach business law and business ethics. Sarvis submitted a resume to the College that stated he had acted as the president and chairman of the board of CMI International, Inc. for a period of time, which included the time Sarvis was in prison. Sarvis also submitted a memorandum requesting that the College not contact previous employers for references. The College hired Sarvis for various positions and entered into three separate employment agreements with Sarvis. The College subsequently learned of Sarvis’s criminal history from his probation officer and terminated Sarvis. Sarvis then sued the College for breach of the employment agreements. The College moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment to the College, and Sarvis appealed to the Vermont Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Skoglund, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership