Saskatoon Star Phoenix Group Inc. v. Noton
Saskatchewan Court of the Queen’s Bench
(2001) 206 Sask. R. 106, 9 W.W.R. 63 (2001)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Saskatoon Star Phoenix Group Inc. (Star Phoenix) (plaintiff) published a newspaper called The StarPhoenix. This daily newspaper was the largest in Saskatchewan and was widely distributed. It also operated an associated website at “www.thestarphoenix.com.” A young man named Noton (defendant) purchased the domain name and address “http://saskatoonstarphoenix.com,” on which he operated a website with content identical to that of Star Phoenix’s website except that it had advertisements for Noton’s web-hosting business as well as from other advertisers contracted by Noton. It also had a message at the bottom of the page that said the site was designed, hosted, and marketed by Noton Inc. Noton deliberately used metatags that would cause people who were searching for Star Phoenix’s website to find his website. Star Phoenix demanded that Noton take the site down. He refused and instead offered to sell the domain to Star Phoenix. Noton admitted this had been his intent in setting up the fake website. Star Phoenix filed suit against Noton for the cause of action of passing off and requested actual and punitive damages, as well as an injunction preventing Noton from using the name Star Phoenix or a domain name containing that name.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Laing, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.