Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School District of San Diego County

177 P.2d 279 (1947)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School District of San Diego County

California Supreme Court
177 P.2d 279 (1947)

Facts

G. E. Satterlee (plaintiff) and his wife were driving northbound on Citrus Drive. A school bus of Orange Glenn School District of San Diego County (the district) (defendant) was traveling westbound on Bear Valley Road. The vehicles were approaching each other perpendicularly at the intersection of the two roads. There was disputed evidence regarding whether the bus driver sped up prior to approaching the intersection so he would reach it before Satterlee. The two vehicles collided at the intersection, resulting in the death of Satterlee’s wife. Satterlee sued the school district to recover damages for the death of his wife and injuries to his person and property. California law held that a driver approaching an intersection must yield the right of way to vehicles already in the intersection from another public road. The code also stated that if both cars approach the intersection at the same time, the car on the left must yield to the car on the right. The school district sought a jury instruction that would tell the jury to find for whichever car entered the intersection first or, if the cars entered at the same time, to find for the car on the right. The trial court refused to read such jury instructions and instead instructed that the right of way is not an absolute right to barge through the intersection and disregard the safety of other drivers. The trial court further asked the jury what a reasonably prudent person would do in that situation. The jury found for Satterlee despite the school district’s assertion of contributory negligence. The school district appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Edmonds, J.)

Dissent (Carter, J.)

Dissent (Traynor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership