Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach

52 Cal. 4th 155 (2011)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach

California Supreme Court
52 Cal. 4th 155 (2011)

AR

Facts

The City of Manhattan Beach (defendant) passed an ordinance banning the use of point-of-sale plastic bags. The Save the Plastic Bag Coalition (coalition) (plaintiff) sued, arguing that the ordinance was unlawful because the city had failed to prepare an environmental-impact report before passing it. The coalition claimed it was an interested citizen seeking the enforcement of public duties, and the city argued the coalition was a corporation that did not have standing to sue and that the ordinance had little environmental effects. The trial court found that the coalition had standing and that the coalition raised a genuine issue of whether a decrease in plastic-bag use would lead to an increase in paper-bag use, which was actually more harmful to the environment because of the pollution caused by paper-bag production. The city appealed, and the appeals court affirmed. The city then appealed to the California Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Corrigan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership