Savely v. MTV Music TV, Viacom

2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77621 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Savely v. MTV Music TV, Viacom

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77621 (2011)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Michael Savely (plaintiff) was a drummer who performed in New York City subways. Savely generated a large portion of his income by giving drumming lessons to children. Representatives of MTV Music TV, Viacom (MTV) (defendant) approached Savely in the subway and asked if they could film him drumming for a film being made by MTV. After reviewing the MTV contract, Savely indicated that he did not consent to being filmed. Savely was concerned that the footage would damage his reputation because of the film’s connection to certain artists and institutions. Savely later learned that MTV had filmed him playing and had used the footage in a program about rapper Nicki Minaj. Savely sued MTV for invasion of privacy by false light, among other claims. Savely alleged that the quality of the images and sounds in the film clip reflected poorly on Savely’s talent and that he was portrayed in a false and disparaging light because Nicki Minaj dressed provocatively and used profanity, and her lifestyle was contrary to Savely’s lifestyle and that of his students and their parents. Savely claimed that after the program aired, he lost students and T-shirt sales and was criticized by fans and supporters. MTV moved to dismiss the false-light claim, arguing that the footage was not distorted and Savely’s images were not linked to Minaj or the film’s themes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wigenton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership