Saylor v. Lindsley

456 F.2d 896 (1972)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Saylor v. Lindsley

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
456 F.2d 896 (1972)

Facts

The sale of the stock of the Tonopah Nicaragua Company (defendant) by the Tonopah Mining Company of Nevada (defendant) to Mines Inc. (defendant) was challenged in a derivative suit by the shareholders of Tonopah Nevada. This suit was in the form of a class action with the multitude of shareholders in Tonopah Nevada as the operative class. On September 24, 1970, the attorney for the shareholders, Mr. Markowitz, settled the suit for the amount of $250,000. The shareholders sought damages into the millions. The shareholders were not informed of the settlement until November 4, 1970 with a hearing date to confirm the settlement set for December 1, 1970. At the time of the hearing, several members of the class, through counsel, objected to the settlement. After briefing on the issue, the district court confirmed the settlement. The objecting class members appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Friendly, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership