Scarborough v. United States

431 U.S. 563 (1977)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Scarborough v. United States

United States Supreme Court
431 U.S. 563 (1977)

Facts

Scarborough (defendant) was convicted of a state drug-related felony. Approximately one year after that conviction, law-enforcement officers were executing a narcotics search warrant against Scarborough and found four firearms in his bedroom. Scarborough was charged under 18 U.S.C. app. § 1202(a)(1), a part of the Omnibus Crime Control Act, which criminalized the receipt, possession, or transportation, in commerce or affecting commerce, of any firearm by a felon. The prosecution offered proof that the guns had moved through interstate commerce prior to Scarborough’s felony conviction as the nexus with commerce required by the statute. Scarborough claimed that he had transferred ownership of the guns to his wife after his felony conviction, and he also asserted that proof that the guns had at some point moved through interstate commerce failed to establish a nexus between his possession of the guns and commerce. Scarborough was convicted and appealed. The appeals court affirmed the conviction and certiorari was granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

Dissent (Stewart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership