Schabe v. Hampton Bays Union Free School District

103 A.D.2d 418, 480 N.Y.S.2d 328 (1984)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schabe v. Hampton Bays Union Free School District

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
103 A.D.2d 418, 480 N.Y.S.2d 328 (1984)

Facts

Jennifer Schabe (plaintiff) was injured when she was hit by a bus near a school operated by the Hampton Bays Union Free School District (district) (defendant). Schabe sued the district, the school, the bus company, and the driver (defendants). Schabe settled with the bus company and driver before trial, but the company’s negligence remained a trial issue because Schabe’s damages had to be reduced to reflect the company’s degree of fault. The trial was bifurcated, with the six-person jury first considering liability. The court instructed the jury that at least five jurors had to agree with each special-verdict answer but that each answer did not require the same five jurors’ assents. In response to a jury inquiry, the court advised that once five jurors answered a question, any dissenting juror was bound by that decision in answering subsequent questions. The jury unanimously concluded that the district was negligent, but only five jurors found that (1) the district proximately caused Schabe’s injuries, (2) the bus company was not negligent, (3) Schabe was negligent and proximately caused her own injuries, and (4) the district was 59 percent at fault. The same five jurors did not agree to these answers. During the jury’s damages deliberations, the court responded to a jury question by explaining that Schabe would receive 59 percent of the award. The jury unanimously awarded $750,000 in damages. The district and school appealed, arguing that (1) the same five jurors had to agree to each special-verdict answer, (2) dissenting jurors were not bound by other jurors’ answers, and (3) the trial court erred in stating that Schabe would receive 59 percent of the damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lazer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership