Schacht v. United States

398 U.S. 58 (1970)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schacht v. United States

United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 58 (1970)

Facts

Daniel Jay Schacht (defendant), while wearing a United States army uniform, performed in a skit in front of a Houston, Texas induction center protesting America’s presence in Vietnam in 1967. Schacht was indicted, tried, and convicted in a United States district court for violating 18 U.S.C. § 702, which makes it a crime for any person to wear, without authority, the uniform, or a distinctive part thereof, of any armed forces of the United States. Schacht was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and to serve a six-month prison term. Schacht appealed and argued that 10 U.S.C. § 772(f) authorizes the wearing of military uniforms for actors portraying a member of the armed services in a theatrical production, so long as the dramatic portrayal does not tend to discredit the military. Schacht argued that his wearing of the uniform was authorized under §772(f) because his skit constituted a theatrical performance, and that as applied to him, the provision limiting such uses to dramatic portrayals that do not tend to discredit the military would impose an unconstitutional restraint on his free-speech rights under the First Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership