Schaefer v. Eastman Community Association
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
836 A.2d 752 (2003)
Eastman Community Association (ECA) (defendant) was a nonprofit corporation governing Eastman, a private, planned community offering recreational amenities. One such amenity was a downhill skiing area called Snow Hill. Eastman’s governing document was its declaration, which set forth ECA’s powers and the rights of Eastman residents. All property within Eastman was held subject to the declaration. The declaration did not expressly bar closing Snow Hill or reserve to Eastman residents the right to decide whether Snow Hill should be closed. After determining the majority of Eastman residents did not use Snow Hill or consider it important, ECA’s board of directors voted to close Snow Hill and sell its chairlift. Certain homeowners (plaintiffs) filed suit, seeking an injunction barring ECA from closing Snow Hill and selling its chairlift. The plaintiffs also sought damages. The plaintiffs argued ECA acted ultra vires in closing Snow Hill, because the declaration did not provide for ECA’s power to close an amenity. The trial court found that ECA acted ultra vires, and ECA appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Duggan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.