From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Schafer v. American Cyanamid Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
20 F.3d 1 (1994)
Lenita Schafer’s young daughter, Melissa (plaintiff), received an oral polio vaccine distributed by American Cyanamid Company (American Cyanamid) (defendant). Subsequently, Lenita contracted polio from what she believed to be the vaccine administered to Melissa. Pursuant to the provisions of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34, Melissa, Lenita, and her husband Mark (plaintiff) followed a special claims procedure and filed petitions for compensation in a Court of Federal Claims, commonly called the Vaccine Court. The Act awarded compensation to those injured by certain vaccines. Once the Vaccine Court made an award to a petitioner, the individual could not thereafter file a tort suit in state court to obtain additional compensation. Subsequently, Mark and Melissa withdrew their petitions from the Vaccine Court and, instead, filed suit in federal district court against American Cyanamid seeking damages under Massachusetts tort law for the loss of Lenita’s companionship and consortium. Lenita, who did not withdraw her petition, was awarded $750,000 by the Vaccine Court for her own injuries, thereby forfeiting her right to pursue a state tort action. American Cyanamid filed a motion to dismiss Mark and Melissa’s suit on the ground that Lenita’s acceptance of the Vaccine Court’s award barred any state tort action by other family members. The district court denied the motion. American Cyanamid filed an interlocutory appeal to the court of appeals seeking review of the district court’s judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.