Scheible v. Brown

333 So. 3d 726 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Scheible v. Brown

Florida Court of Appeals
333 So. 3d 726 (2022)

Facts

Jeffrey Scheible (plaintiff) inherited the home of his deceased sister in 2008. Scheible allowed his niece, Janice Johnson, to live in the home with her boyfriend, Audley Brown (defendant). Two years later, Scheible executed a quitclaim deed transferring the property to Johnson. In June 2015, Johnson died, and Scheible became the personal representative of her estate. Scheible discovered that Brown had sold the property to third-party purchasers. Investigation revealed that Johnson had supposedly conveyed the property to Brown in a quitclaim deed dated February 2015 and bearing Johnson’s signature. However, that deed was recorded in July 2015—after Johnson’s death. Scheible brought suit against various parties, including Nea Richardson (defendant), the notary public who had apparently notarized the quitclaim deed despite Johnson’s absence. The trial court found in favor of the estate, awarding $247,000 in damages. But Richardson moved for a new trial, arguing that her negligence was not a proximate cause of injury to the estate. The court agreed, holding that the original deed was a forgery and void, thus making its subsequent notarization by Richardson irrelevant. Scheible appealed the order of a new trial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Warner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership