Scheible v. Joseph L. Morse Geriatric Center, Inc.
Florida District Court of Appeal
988 So. 2d 1130 (2008)
Facts
The Joseph L. Morse Geriatric Center (Morse) (defendant), a nursing home, admitted as a patient Madeline Neumann (plaintiff), an elderly woman diagnosed with senile dementia and a seizure disorder. Neumann’s granddaughter and healthcare surrogate, Linda Scheible (plaintiff) was present at the time of Neumann’s admission and provided Morse with a living will or advance healthcare directive signed by Scheible and Neumann. The advance healthcare directive stated that Morse staff members were not to prolong Neumann’s life through treatments or resuscitation because she had a terminal condition. Almost three years later, Morse staff members found Neumann unresponsive due to respiratory arrest and called emergency-medical-services technicians who resuscitated Neumann, intubated her, and transported her to the hospital. Two days later, hospital staff members removed the tube from Neumann’s airway. Four days later, Neumann died in the hospital from cardiopulmonary arrest. Scheible filed a complaint, alleging that Morse willfully disregarded Neumann’s advance healthcare directive in violation of Florida’s Nursing Home Resident’s Rights Act (NHRRA). Morse moved for summary judgment on this claim. The trial court granted the summary-judgment motion on the basis that the personal representative of an estate could not bring an action against a nursing home for violation of a patient’s bill of rights under NHRRA if the deprivation or infringement did not cause the patient’s death. Scheible appealed the trial court’s ruling and argued that it misinterpreted NHRRA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shahood, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.