Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York

519 U.S. 357 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York

United States Supreme Court
519 U.S. 357 (1997)

JL

Facts

A group of protestors (defendants) had been forming large-scale blockades around medical clinics that offered abortion services. The protestors had been marching, standing, kneeling, sitting, and lying in the parking-lot entrances and doorways of the clinics. The protestors had also been harassing female patients going into the clinics, including pushing, shoving, and grabbing the patients, as well as grabbing and spitting on clinic volunteers who were escorting the patients in and out of the clinic. Four clinics and three doctors (plaintiffs) learned of a planned blockade and sought a temporary restraining order. The trial court granted the temporary restraining order, which prohibited blocking access to the clinics or physically abusing or harassing any patients. The order also prohibited the protestors from demonstrating within 15 feet of any patient, except that two sidewalk counselors were permitted to approach and talk to the patients in all areas. If the patients indicated the conversations were unwanted, the sidewalk counselors had to move back to the 15-foot buffer zone. However, the protestors continued to harass the patients, and the trial court entered a preliminary injunction that was mostly consistent with the temporary restraining order, except that the 15-foot buffer zone now applied to both patients and vehicles. This moving buffer zone was referred to as the floating buffer zone. The protestors appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Breyer, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership