Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.
United States Supreme Court
419 U.S. 885, 95 S.Ct. 157, 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Alberto-Culver Company (plaintiff), an American company headquartered in Illinois, signed a contract with Fritz Scherk (defendant), a German citizen residing in Switzerland. Under the contract, Scherk sold his businesses to Alberto-Culver, along with all related trademarks. Scherk’s businesses were registered in Germany and Liechtenstein. The contract contained an arbitration clause stating that all disputes arising out of the contract would be sent for arbitration to the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris. Further, the contract stated that Illinois law would govern the contract. After the execution of the contract, Alberto-Culver discovered other claims to the trademarks. Alberto-Culver sued Scherk in United States federal district court, asserting a violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (act). Scherk filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, or, alternatively a motion to compel arbitration. The district court denied the motion to dismiss and granted an injunction preventing arbitration. The district court relied on § 14 of the act, which voided any waiver of provisions of the act, including the ability to select a judicial forum. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.