Schisler v. Sullivan

3 F.3d 563 (1993)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schisler v. Sullivan

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
3 F.3d 563 (1993)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

Robert Schisler and Jonathan Aldrich separately represented classes of disability benefits claimants (plaintiffs) who sued the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Louis Sullivan (defendant), in United States district courts. The class members alleged that the secretary’s regulations modified circuit precedent by only giving treating physicians’ opinions controlling weight when they were supported by medically acceptable laboratory findings and diagnostic techniques and were not inconsistent with other substantial evidence of record. Second Circuit precedent gave the opinions controlling weight even when they were not supported by other evidence of record. Because the administration never acquiesced to the circuit rule before implementing the regulations, different rules had been applied when disabilities were determined by administrative adjudication versus following judicial review. The district courts decided, in each of the cases, that the regulations applied to administrative proceedings while circuit precedent still governed judicial review, leading to the courts’ affirmation of administrative rulings applying the new regulations while remanding those that were being considered upon judicial review for further proceedings consistent with circuit precedent. The classes were consolidated to settle the law, and a stay was granted pending appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Winter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 819,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership