Schlosser v. Welk
Illinois Appellate Court
550 N.E.2d 241 (1990)
Rhonda Welk (defendant) was an employee of Select-A-Video, which was owned by Marianne Schlosser (plaintiff). Select-A-Video had a policy by which employees could take videotapes home to watch for free. One morning, Welk put eight videotapes in her car to take home. Later that day she was fired. Welk nevertheless took the tapes home. Welk put the tapes in a closet and never watched them. Several weeks later, Welk came across the tapes while cleaning her home, and returned them to the store. Schlosser sued Welk. The trial court ruled in Schlosser’s favor and awarded $549 in damages, the amount Welk would have been charged had she rented the eight tapes for that time period. Welk appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wombacher, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Heiple, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.