Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Schlude v. Commissioner

372 U.S. 128 (1963)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Schlude v. Commissioner

United States Supreme Court

372 U.S. 128 (1963)

Facts

The Schludes (plaintiffs) operated a dancing studio under a franchise from a parent company. The Schludes allowed the studio’s students to pay either full tuition on enrollment or tuition in installments that would only become due when the student completed a dance lesson. This meant that a student’s tuition often went unpaid for a year or more after the student signed the contract. Whenever a contract was signed, the Schludes paid the parent company a percentage of the student’s tuition as a franchise fee. The Schludes deducted those fees from their taxable gross income for the year. However, the Schludes used the accrual method of accounting and did not include unpaid tuition installments in their gross income until the payments became due. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that the unpaid tuition installments were taxable gross income in the year the student signed the contract. The Schludes petitioned the tax court for a redetermination. The tax court ruled for the commissioner, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated the court of appeals’ judgment. The Court remanded the case to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of American Automobile Association v. United States, 367 U.S. 687 (1961). The court of appeals affirmed for the commissioner. The Court granted certiorari again.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership