Schlude v. Commissioner
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 128 (1963)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The Schludes (plaintiffs) operated a dancing studio under a franchise from a parent company. The Schludes allowed the studio’s students to pay either full tuition on enrollment or tuition in installments that would only become due when the student completed a dance lesson. This meant that a student’s tuition often went unpaid for a year or more after the student signed the contract. Whenever a contract was signed, the Schludes paid the parent company a percentage of the student’s tuition as a franchise fee. The Schludes deducted those fees from their taxable gross income for the year. However, the Schludes used the accrual method of accounting and did not include unpaid tuition installments in their gross income until the payments became due. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that the unpaid tuition installments were taxable gross income in the year the student signed the contract. The Schludes petitioned the tax court for a redetermination. The tax court ruled for the commissioner, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated the court of appeals’ judgment. The Court remanded the case to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of American Automobile Association v. United States, 367 U.S. 687 (1961). The court of appeals affirmed for the commissioner. The Court granted certiorari again.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.