Schmitz v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

122 N.E.3d 80 (2018)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schmitz v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

Ohio Supreme Court
122 N.E.3d 80 (2018)

Facts

Between 1974 and 1978, student Steven Schmitz (plaintiff) played football for the University of Notre Dame (Notre Dame) (defendant), a member of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (defendant). Notre Dame’s coaches encouraged players to use their helmeted heads in tackling and blocking maneuvers. As a result, Schmitz sustained repeated brain impacts. He was not, however, examined for concussions or warned of the potential long-term effects of concussions. In December 2012, long after his college football career ended, Schmitz was diagnosed with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a disease that caused progressive cognitive decline. Believing that Schmitz’s CTE was traceable to repeated, untreated head injuries sustained in college football, Schmitz and his wife, Yvette Schmitz (defendant) filed suit against Notre Dame and the NCAA in October 2014. Among other things, they asserted multiple claims based on bodily injury allegedly resulting from Notre Dame and the NCAA’s ignoring and aggravating medical risks. Notre Dame and the NCAA moved to dismiss, arguing that the claims were barred by the statute of limitations because they were filed more than two years after any football injuries occurred. The trial court granted the motion, but the court of appeals reversed, holding that there was a colorable argument that Schmitz’s cause of action did not accrue until December 2012, when he claimed to first become aware of his latent injuries. Notre Dame and the NCAA appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (French, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership