From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
United States Supreme Court
412 U.S. 218 (1973)
Facts
A police officer made a routine traffic stop, lacking any probable cause, and asked for permission to search the car. The brother of the car's owner gave consent. Upon searching the vehicle, the officer discovered three stolen checks, which were later linked to Robert Bustamonte (defendant), one of the six passengers riding in the car. Over Bustamonte’s objections, the state trial court allowed the evidence of the checks to be admitted at trial, and Bustamonte was convicted of theft. The state appellate court upheld the conviction. Bustamonte petitioned the federal district court for a writ of habeas corpus, but the district court denied Bustamonte's petition. The federal appellate court reversed and set aside the district court's order, holding that in order to prove voluntariness, the prosecution had to establish that the person giving consent knew he had the right to withhold consent. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.