United States Supreme Court
412 U.S. 218 (1973)
A police officer making a routine traffic stop, lacking any probable cause, asked for permission to search the car. The brother of the owner of the car gave consent. Upon searching the vehicle, the officer discovered three stolen checks which were later linked to Bustamonte (defendant), one of the six passengers riding in the car. Over Bustamonte’s objections, the trial court allowed the evidence of the checks to be admitted at trial and Bustamonte was convicted of theft. On appeal, the court of appeals held that in order to prove voluntariness, the prosecution had to establish that the person giving consent knew he had the right to refuse the request.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.