Schnell v. Schnell
North Dakota Supreme Court
346 N.W.2d 713 (1984)
Joan Schnell (defendant) was married to Robert Schnell (plaintiff), and they owned a ranch of approximately 4,400 acres as tenants in common. Following their divorce, Robert petitioned the court to sell the property and divide the proceeds. Joan asserted that the property should be divided, or partitioned in kind. The property had been developed as a model ranch, which meant that the buildings, pastures, and machinery were planned to maximize the efficiency of its operations. There were three homes on the property. Joan lived in the main home, and Robert lived in the second home, which was constructed after the divorce. One of the ranch workers lived in the third home. If the property were sold, Robert planned to purchase it and continue operations as a ranch. Robert was a successful auctioneer and was a member of a partnership that leased ranch land in Montana and South Dakota. Joan was employed with the United States Department of Agriculture. Joan spent most of her adult life raising her family, developing and supervising the ranch, and learning the ranch business. Joan’s financial worth is based almost exclusively on her interest in the ranch. Robert received significant income from his auctioneering duties. Joan has also offered to lease her portion of the property back to Robert, if the ranch were divided instead of sold. The trial court determined that the value of each cotenant’s share from a partition would be substantially less than the money each would receive from a sale of the whole. The trial court also determined that dividing the property would destroy the efficiency and balance that had been planned when the ranch was developed. Joan appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sand, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.