Schreiber v. Estate of Kiser
California Supreme Court
22 Cal. 4th 31, 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 293, 989 P.2d 720 (1999)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Dawn Schreiber (plaintiff) was in an automobile accident with Donald Wayne Kiser, who subsequently died. Schreiber sued Kiser’s estate and the City of Huntington Beach. In accordance with Code of Civil Procedure § 2034(a)(2), requiring the submission of an expert-witness declaration, Schreiber designated expert witnesses, but she did not submit expert-witness declarations for her treating physicians, who the trial court precluded from giving their opinions about the cause of Schreiber’s injuries. The jury returned a defense verdict, specifically finding Kiser’s negligence did not cause Schreiber’s damages. Schreiber appealed, and the appellate court affirmed, concluding that once a treating physician offers opinion testimony about causation, this exceeds the treating physician’s role of giving percipient testimony and becomes a retained expert witness within the meaning of § 2034(a)(2). Schreiber’s petition for rehearing was denied, so Schreiber petitioned for further review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.