Schreiber v. Estate of Kiser

22 Cal. 4th 31, 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 293, 989 P.2d 720 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schreiber v. Estate of Kiser

California Supreme Court
22 Cal. 4th 31, 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 293, 989 P.2d 720 (1999)

Facts

Dawn Schreiber (plaintiff) was in an automobile accident with Donald Wayne Kiser, who subsequently died. Schreiber sued Kiser’s estate and the City of Huntington Beach. In accordance with Code of Civil Procedure § 2034(a)(2), requiring the submission of an expert-witness declaration, Schreiber designated expert witnesses, but she did not submit expert-witness declarations for her treating physicians, who the trial court precluded from giving their opinions about the cause of Schreiber’s injuries. The jury returned a defense verdict, specifically finding Kiser’s negligence did not cause Schreiber’s damages. Schreiber appealed, and the appellate court affirmed, concluding that once a treating physician offers opinion testimony about causation, this exceeds the treating physician’s role of giving percipient testimony and becomes a retained expert witness within the meaning of § 2034(a)(2). Schreiber’s petition for rehearing was denied, so Schreiber petitioned for further review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership