Schrier v. Beltway Alarm Company
Maryland Court of Special Appeals
73 Md.App. 281, 533 A.2d 1316 (1987)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Eugene and Sheila Schrier (plaintiffs) were principal shareholders in a corporation that operated a liquor store. Eugene also worked in the liquor store. The corporation entered into an agreement with Beltway Alarm Company (defendant) for an alarm system for the liquor store. The contract contained a limitation-of-liability provision limiting Beltway Alarm’s total liability to $250 or the total of six monthly payments under the contract, whichever is less. This limitation-of-liability provision was also referred to as a liquidated-damages provision in the contract. The contract permitted the Schriers to pay a higher premium in order to increase the limitation on liability, but the Schriers did not do so. While the contract was in effect, the liquor store was robbed. Eugene activated two alarm buttons, but the robber shot and severely wounded Eugene. The Schriers sued Beltway Alarm, alleging negligence, breach of contract, and breach of warranty. The Schriers alleged that Beltway Alarm delayed notifying the police by 14 minutes and that the shooting would not have occurred if the police had been timely notified. Beltway Alarm filed a motion for summary judgment with regard to any claim for more than $250, in accordance with the limitation-of-liability provision. The trial court granted the motion, and the Schriers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alpert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.