Schroeder v. Hamilton School District

282 F.3d 946 (2002)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schroeder v. Hamilton School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
282 F.3d 946 (2002)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

Tommy Schroeder (plaintiff) taught sixth grade at Templeton Middle School in Hamilton School District (the district) (defendant). Schroeder disclosed that he was gay in a public meeting. During the 1993–94 school year, students began to taunt Schroeder about his homosexuality with crude, cruel comments. Schroeder reported the incidents, and some students were disciplined, but the anonymous harassment was not punished. Schroeder demanded that the district conduct sensitivity training to condemn discrimination against homosexuals. Patty Polczynski, the school’s principal, circulated a memorandum encouraging teachers to discipline students who continued to use inappropriate and offensive race- and gender-related words. Schroeder requested a transfer to Lannon Elementary School, where the harassment continued. In February 1998, Schroeder resigned shortly after having a mental breakdown. Schroeder applied for medical and long-term disability benefits. At the end of the 1998–99 school year, the district terminated Schroeder pursuant to his employment contract. Schroeder filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit, alleging that the district had violated his equal-protection rights by failing to take effective steps to prevent harassment about Schroeder’s homosexuality by students, parents, and fellow staff. The court granted summary judgment for the district. Schroeder appealed, alleging that the district had discriminated against him because the memorandum failed to address the homophobic comments in the same manner as racist comments; the district failed to conduct annual trainings against sexual-orientation discrimination as it it did for racism and sexism; and the district had policies against racism and sexism but not against sexual-orientation discrimination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Manion, J.)

Dissent (Wood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership