Schult v. Schult
Supreme Court of Connecticut
699 A.2d 134 (Conn. 1997)
Cheryl Schult (plaintiff) and Jeffrey Schult (defendant) were married. The Schults had one child, who suffered from emotional and developmental issues. Cheryl filed a petition for divorce, seeking custody of the child. Joan Radin, the child’s maternal grandmother, intervened in the case. The child was injured while in the care of Cheryl’s live-in boyfriend, Steve Norman. Cheryl and Norman denied that Norman had caused the injury. At Cheryl’s request, the trial court appointed a guardian ad litem for the child. At Jeffrey’s request, the trial court appointed an attorney for the child. Several mental health experts testified that custody of the child should be given to Radin, in part because the child would not be safe with Cheryl and Norman. Cheryl, Norman, and the guardian ad litem were the only witnesses to testify that the child would be safe if custody were granted to Cheryl. The child’s appointed attorney, in her closing arguments, recommended that Radin be granted custody. The trial court granted sole custody of the child to Radin and awarded visitation rights to Cheryl and Jeffrey. The appellate court affirmed. The child’s guardian ad litem appealed, arguing that the guardian ad litem was, in effect, the attorney’s client and thus the attorney should not have been permitted to advocate a position contrary to that of the guardian ad litem.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Borden, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.