Schulz v. State of New York

639 N.E.2d 1140 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schulz v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals
639 N.E.2d 1140 (1994)

SC

Facts

The New York State Legislature (defendant) passed a law authorizing over $20 million in state bond funding for the purpose of transportation. Specifically, the act authorized the State Thruway Authority and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (the authorities), each a public corporation, to receive funding. The funding was required to be appropriated by the legislature and was derived from taxes and fees collected in exchange for the public’s use of the authorities’ services. The act explicitly stated that any bonds issued were not to be considered a debt of the state. The act also stated that the state had no legal or moral obligation to appropriate funding or otherwise support the authorities financially. Robert Schulz (plaintiff) sued the state, claiming that the law created state debt that was constitutionally required to be approved by a referendum. Alternatively, Schulz claimed that the law created a moral obligation on the part of the state to fund the authorities and not let them default on bond payments. The trial court ruled that the bonding did not violate the state constitution. The appellate court affirmed. Schulz appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership